Pricing
Saving a scenario is free. The optional kit is the SaaS Checkout Fee Decision Kit, a self-serve digital download for running the decision process yourself.
Save your SaaS checkout assumptions before comparing Stripe, PayPal, Paddle, Lemon Squeezy, Polar, or a merchant-of-record setup. The optional kit is a separate downloadable decision kit.
Store the monthly revenue, order count, international card share, refund assumptions, current provider, and decision question you want to model before wiring checkout.
The form is free. The optional kit is a separate self-serve digital kit with downloadable templates and checklists.
A scenario worksheet is most useful when a checkout decision changes after you model a real SaaS case instead of a generic processing rate. Start with the closest case below, then save the result if you want to compare it later.
| Scenario | Best first check | Decision question |
|---|---|---|
| Low-ticket monthly SaaS | Model fixed-fee drag | Would annual billing beat switching providers? |
| Global launch with tax concerns | Compare Stripe Tax and Paddle | Is tax workflow the real reason to pay MoR fees? |
| Stripe, PayPal, and MoR comparison | Compare checkout routes | Which provider fits the buyer mix and support burden? |
| Migration from an existing provider | Review migration tradeoffs | Do subscriptions, invoices, refunds, and customer records make the move risky? |
Saving a scenario is free. The optional kit is the SaaS Checkout Fee Decision Kit, a self-serve digital download for running the decision process yourself.
You are choosing a checkout stack before launch, switching away from Stripe, adding EU or global customers, or selling low-ticket SaaS where fixed fees matter.
You need tax, legal, accounting, or financial advice. This is a practical checkout economics review, not a professional compliance opinion.
For a $9 monthly plan with 850 orders and 40% international cards, annual billing may matter more than switching providers. Stripe can look cheaper, but merchant-of-record tooling may be worth testing if tax and support work would slow the launch.
A decision worksheet is useful when the answer changes across scenarios: monthly versus annual billing, domestic versus global customers, direct processing versus merchant of record, or low refund rate versus realistic refund rate. If the winner never changes, the free calculator result is usually enough. The kit helps document those assumptions before implementation.
| Check | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Average order value | Fixed fees can dominate low-ticket SaaS and make annual billing more important than provider switching. |
| International card share | Global customers can raise the blended fee and change whether an MoR provider deserves consideration. |
| Tax workflow | Stripe Tax, sales tax software, and merchant-of-record providers solve different parts of the tax problem. |
| Migration risk | Subscriptions, webhooks, invoices, refund history, and customer records can make switching painful later. |
The most useful saved scenario includes current provider, monthly revenue, order count, average order value, international-card share, refund rate, chargeback rate, tax workflow, subscription billing model, and the decision you are trying to make. If you are pre-launch, send the expected price point, launch countries, buyer type, and whether you care more about checkout control or outsourced payment operations.
The goal is not to predict the perfect provider. The goal is to find the assumption that changes the answer: low average order value, global card mix, tax registration burden, dispute risk, refund policy, payout timing, or the hidden work of moving customers after the first checkout stack is live.
No. Saving a checkout fee scenario is free. Any optional kit is a separate self-serve digital product with downloadable files.
The SaaS Checkout Fee Decision Kit includes worksheets, checklists, formulas, and provider-comparison templates for making your own checkout decision.
No. The calculator and kit are for checkout economics planning. Use qualified professionals for tax, legal, accounting, or financial advice.